T3 turbonetics manifold for 4G63

peregrine · Post by **peregrine** » Wed May 16, 2007 3:29 pm

excellent manifold for the price. although $250 with the gate would be a better deal

Post by **DJpowerHaus** » Wed May 16, 2007 4:13 pm

any idea how that baby fits in the engine bay with that wastegate position?

peregrine · Post by **peregrine** » Wed May 16, 2007 6:14 pm

mainstream wrote:

Best I could come up with.

Kane

heres a beeter pic installed. im actually gonna change it so it goes back into the downpipe this summer. this looks so fuckin janky

Robert Venable · Post by **Robert Venable** » Thu May 17, 2007 12:35 am

Hmm, this seems like someting I could use, only problem is I was thinking of running a GT2871R - 472560

I'm pretty sure this turbo would not bolt to this Manifold. Can anyone tell me for sure??

Also, I looked up the next largest turbo that I believe would fit. I found this one. Only problem is I think it's too big for my wants. Can you guys tell me what you think? Looking to build a low RPM (6500 and less), 300 hp, quick spooling 2.4 liter with 10-15 lbs boost max, on 93 octane fuel.

Sorry to hogg up your post, mainstream, with these questions, but I'm actually interested.

Robert Venable · Post by **Robert Venable** » Fri May 18, 2007 12:49 am

You think the T3 .63 or.64 would not be too restrictive with my set up? And what rpm would you think I should expect boost to start building with one of these housings?

Also, I have a 2G head-- does this matter?

peregrine · Post by **peregrine** » Fri May 18, 2007 10:32 am

i have a .63 housing on my 2.4 and its fine. gt35 turbo.

Robert Venable · Post by **Robert Venable** » Sat May 19, 2007 2:22 am

Problem is with the DSM forums is that they refuse to listen to my actual needs, wants, and setup.
Every DSMer that I've talked to has told me that I need something way bigger, normally capable of 500-700 hp. They think that because I'm building a 2.4 I must want a super high HP car, no matter how much I tell them that this is a LOW RPM TRUCK.

Robert Venable · Post by **Robert Venable** » Wed May 23, 2007 8:53 pm

Sorry about that man, I think I'll pass this time. I'm not too hot on how the front blow off valve will work with my RWD setup. Thanks for the chance.