Starion 4g6x Swap ???s

All the oily, spinning bits

Moderators: DJpowerHaus, mattmartindrift

Post Reply
Dealz
Knowlege Seeker
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: FL

Starion 4g6x Swap ???s

Post by Dealz »

Ive been doing some research before I start my 4G6x swap into my 88 starion. Im pretty much sure that i will be going with a 6 bolt 4G64 wideblock block with a 1g dsm head , but Buschur Racing has the adapters that lets you use a t350, t400 or a GM Powerglide with a 4g63 narrow block( according to Nick @ Buschur Racing) but they are all automatic trannies and im kind of a fan of manual trannies. If I do go with a wideblock i was looking into the T-56 conversion by MidwestTurbo does anyone have experience with that set up? Or maybe a Toyota w-series transmission by Japaneese Auto Repair? Are theese transmissions worth the money and effort? Thanks for your help I have other questions but first things first.

Thanks ,Walter
Old Colt
Addict
Posts: 129
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:48 am
Location: Vermont USA
Contact:

Post by Old Colt »

Have you thought to look around this site to see what resources are here?
Bill Hincher
Donating Member
Posts: 1625
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:57 pm
Location: Toledo,Ohio
Contact:

Post by Bill Hincher »




All my stuff is built for the 4G63 narrow block, the thought being that it would save the expense of building the wide block.
I have built one series for the W-55 and now I have built the new bellhousing for the r 154
Tomuchnos , has asked about a the 'T' series trans and Doug Nash set ups, he was supposed to come up with some drawings.
I can build it , but I gotta get some intake and exhaust work done first
I don't understand why you would want to build a ' truck wide block motor' compared to a ' perfomance narrow block motor'
Having a 400lbs transmission hanging on the back of the 4G63 makes no sense to me either. So what ? it handles power, but it makes the car heavier and it handles like a pig, and you gotta wrap the floor boards around it.
Sports cars were made for manual transmissions , old people invented auto transmissions so they could aviod buying a coffee cup holder and answer thier cell phone.
peregrine
Too Much Time on His Hands
Posts: 492
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 5:26 pm

Post by peregrine »

Bill Hincher wrote:


All my stuff is built for the 4G63 narrow block, the thought being that it would save the expense of building the wide block.
I have built one series for the W-55 and now I have built the new bellhousing for the r 154
Tomuchnos , has asked about a the 'T' series trans and Doug Nash set ups, he was supposed to come up with some drawings.
I can build it , but I gotta get some intake and exhaust work done first
I don't understand why you would want to build a ' truck wide block motor' compared to a ' perfomance narrow block motor'
Having a 400lbs transmission hanging on the back of the 4G63 makes no sense to me either. So what ? it handles power, but it makes the car heavier and it handles like a pig, and you gotta wrap the floor boards around it.
Sports cars were made for manual transmissions , old people invented auto transmissions so they could aviod buying a coffee cup holder and answer thier cell phone.
:lol: :lol: youve obviously never been in a fast, auto, turbo car. they go together like bread and butter. no missed shifts, launching at 5500 on the brake. theres nothing like it. yeah 5 speeds are fun to screw around with and they make you feel more in control, but for my car and what i built it for, an auto is the only way to go :wink:
Image
Bill Hincher
Donating Member
Posts: 1625
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:57 pm
Location: Toledo,Ohio
Contact:

Post by Bill Hincher »



Your right about the auto trans for the dragstrip and dating, its much easier to 'cop' a feel on the date if you dont gotta shift.
And yeah, a 5500RPM launch with a 392 hemi/ torqueflite is like standing next to a moving train and reaching out to grab it.
It just dont feel right to me to run an auto trans,built for a truck, in a sports car.
It's like Anna Nicole Smith dating an old guy for money, it just don't FEEL right.

I am wrong, I am sorry, I can change, if I have to, maybe, almost :D
peregrine
Too Much Time on His Hands
Posts: 492
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 5:26 pm

Post by peregrine »

Bill Hincher wrote:

Your right about the auto trans for the dragstrip and dating, its much easier to 'cop' a feel on the date if you dont gotta shift.
And yeah, a 5500RPM launch with a 392 hemi/ torqueflite is like standing next to a moving train and reaching out to grab it.
It just dont feel right to me to run an auto trans,built for a truck, in a sports car.
It's like Anna Nicole Smith dating an old guy for money, it just don't FEEL right.

I am wrong, I am sorry, I can change, if I have to, maybe, almost :D
i dont fuck on the first date........
Image
Bill Hincher
Donating Member
Posts: 1625
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:57 pm
Location: Toledo,Ohio
Contact:

Post by Bill Hincher »



LIAR!.............................liar,liar,liar
Dealz
Knowlege Seeker
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: FL

Post by Dealz »

Im looking to go with 350 to 400 hp Im intrested in the transmission that will hold up good to that much power and still keep as much reliability as i can. Also which transmissions would be best for a street/track car?
Dealz
Knowlege Seeker
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: FL

Post by Dealz »

Bill Hincher wrote:


All my stuff is built for the 4G63 narrow block, the thought being that it would save the expense of building the wide block.
I have built one series for the W-55 and now I have built the new bellhousing for the r 154
Tomuchnos , has asked about a the 'T' series trans and Doug Nash set ups, he was supposed to come up with some drawings.
I can build it , but I gotta get some intake and exhaust work done first
I don't understand why you would want to build a ' truck wide block motor' compared to a ' perfomance narrow block motor'
Having a 400lbs transmission hanging on the back of the 4G63 makes no sense to me either. So what ? it handles power, but it makes the car heavier and it handles like a pig, and you gotta wrap the floor boards around it.
Sports cars were made for manual transmissions , old people invented auto transmissions so they could aviod buying a coffee cup holder and answer thier cell phone.

Im taking intrest in the r154 anything i should look for? what Flywheel/Clutch/Pressure Plate would i need for this swap?
Bill Hincher
Donating Member
Posts: 1625
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:57 pm
Location: Toledo,Ohio
Contact:

Post by Bill Hincher »

I used a box stock 9 inch Toyota clutch disc

Image
I used a FWD Mitsubishi Flywheel and pressure plate
Image
I used a FWD Mitsubishi pivot ball and clutch fork
Image
I used a box stock Toyota W-55 trans throw out bearing and collar
Image
Image
Image
The center hole on the flywheel must be opened up to 32 mm
Image
Image
and finally I used a Toyota W-55 trans hydraulic clutch cylinder and pilot brg
Image

Everything is cheap and easy to find, I am making a video of how it all comes together so I can show you anything you want to know
Dealz
Knowlege Seeker
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: FL

Post by Dealz »

Bill Hincher wrote:I used a box stock 9 inch Toyota clutch disc

Image
I used a FWD Mitsubishi Flywheel and pressure plate
Image
I used a FWD Mitsubishi pivot ball and clutch fork
Image
I used a box stock Toyota W-55 trans throw out bearing and collar
Image
Image
Image
The center hole on the flywheel must be opened up to 32 mm
Image
Image
and finally I used a Toyota W-55 trans hydraulic clutch cylinder and pilot brg
Image

Everything is cheap and easy to find, I am making a video of how it all comes together so I can show you anything you want to know
Cool... Are there any aftermarket clutches that would work or will the stock 9 inch work good? also i have a Fidanza 8lbs Flywheel and a 2600 pressure plate? could i use these as well?
Bill Hincher
Donating Member
Posts: 1625
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:57 pm
Location: Toledo,Ohio
Contact:

Post by Bill Hincher »

the only thing you would have to check is the throw out bearing crown to make sure it would mate with the B 2600 pressure plate
Dealz
Knowlege Seeker
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: FL

Post by Dealz »

Bill Hincher wrote:the only thing you would have to check is the throw out bearing crown to make sure it would mate with the B 2600 pressure plate

im sorry i left out its for a fwd gst if you didnt already assume that
DJpowerHaus
Sir Post A Lot
Posts: 1779
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD
Contact:

Post by DJpowerHaus »

Walter. Your last post confused the heck out of me. You're doing a FWD eclipse narrow 2.0 or an 88 Starion with a wideblock 2.4?

A T56 is a sure fire way to get a reliable transmission behind a wideblock. From the looks of things on SQC transmission tunnel modifications are minimal. Maybe some banging in spots, but nothing bad. You can get a clutch that will hold big torque with stock like pedal pressure.

B2600 Transmissions come 2nd for wideblocks in my mind but may be difficult to find and not as strong as the T56. Clutches and flywheels are the same as a Starion and 400hp might require a heavy clutch. There are twin plate clutch/flywheel options though which may still be heavy but have some nice benefits

88/89 Starion boxes are a good way to get the car on the road on a budget if you want to worry about the transmission at a later date. Clutches are the same as what I wrote for the B2600 above.

Bill's "Billhousings" are a nice way for narrowblocks. Definitely better than a D50 narrowblock transmission. Not sure what clutches you'd need for the power you'd like to make but I imagine it would be similar to a Starion clutch.
Image
Getting the engine bolted in is about 10% of the way there.
The next 80% can go quickly with help and skill.
That last 10% takes about as long as the 90% that came before it.
Dealz
Knowlege Seeker
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: FL

Post by Dealz »

DJpowerHaus wrote:Walter. Your last post confused the heck out of me. You're doing a FWD eclipse narrow 2.0 or an 88 Starion with a wideblock 2.4?

A T56 is a sure fire way to get a reliable transmission behind a wideblock. From the looks of things on SQC transmission tunnel modifications are minimal. Maybe some banging in spots, but nothing bad. You can get a clutch that will hold big torque with stock like pedal pressure.

B2600 Transmissions come 2nd for wideblocks in my mind but may be difficult to find and not as strong as the T56. Clutches and flywheels are the same as a Starion and 400hp might require a heavy clutch. There are twin plate clutch/flywheel options though which may still be heavy but have some nice benefits

88/89 Starion boxes are a good way to get the car on the road on a budget if you want to worry about the transmission at a later date. Clutches are the same as what I wrote for the B2600 above.

Bill's "Billhousings" are a nice way for narrowblocks. Definitely better than a D50 narrowblock transmission. Not sure what clutches you'd need for the power you'd like to make but I imagine it would be similar to a Starion clutch.
I am doing an 88 starion with a 4g6x. I am not sure wether I want to go with a 2.0 narrow block or a 2.4 wideblock. I want a transmission that will be able to take the power and not have to worry too much about breaking something. Bills "Billhousings " seem to be a good way to go they seem pretty strong. I thought the t56 was for a narrowblock but its good to know. I have a bunch of aftermarket parts from my 1g and 2g fwd dsm's I was just thinking that I might be able to use some of it.
Post Reply