::Project 0G::

Rack & Pinion
 
The designers at Mitsubishi decided to use a reciprocating ball steering gear box in their flagship sports car.  This severely effects steering feed back and introduces un wanted play into the steering.  Another problem with these units is age.  I replaced my leaky unit with another that also leaked.  All that leaky fluid caused paint to peel off the frame.

Here is an animation of the play in the steering wheel.  Yup.  That's sitting still and it no... even with all that movement the wheels don't move.  It is not unusual for a StarQuest to have some steering play.  This isn't necessarily due to the gearbox, but it does need addressing.
My search for a donor rack was pretty short.  Lots of hotrods use Pinto/ Mustang II racks for some reason.  These are available through most parts catalogs.  But parts catalogs are for new things.  I can't afford new things so I am getting one off of a 240.  The reason I chose this one is because it will be compatible with the power steering pump of the SR.  Then again there's probably not even a difference between the gearbox pump and this... but whatever. 

I measured a 240 rack and it just happens to be the 20" from ball-joint to ball-joint that I was looking for.  I have been trying not to screw with the steering geometry of the car.  I am no engineer so I don't want to screw up the geometry that cost Mitsubishi millions to develop 20 some years ago.

Here is a diagram I've made to show the left - right movement of the rack.  It moves (A) 47/8".  I'm looking for a rack that will come close to this.  I'm settling on the HICAS for  now.  It's A measures XX" (coming soon).

In this photo you see the measurements I took off the stock Starion rack.  Both tie rods (A) are 15" long.  B is the length of the rack, 20".  From what I measured on a 240 the B section is 20" inches as well.  But then again I might have that wrong because I measure like a drunk retard.  I'm still looking to find out how long the tie rods are on a 240 (S13).  I'm now looking into HICAS steering racks from 240s.  Should be the same dimensions as a regular rack but with a quicker ratio (14.9:1 vs. 17:1).  It's also less turns lock to lock (2.6 vs. 3.1).  The Starion's steering was 2.8 turns lock to lock so 2.6 will be a small upgrade.

I got my rack today!

Look how close the lengths are to each other!  It does look that I'll need to max out the threads on the tie-rods to make them the same as the HICAS rack is a tad longer.  I'm actually surprised I even got everything from tie rod end to tie rod end.  Now to get it all mounted and safe.  Here's the plan:

That's  where I plan on mounting it.  I'll have to knock off the 2 stoppers on the cross-member and weld on some brackets.  From the distance away from the frame rail holes, it looks like I'll have enough room for the steering column.  Now I need to line up some U-Joints for this.

This is more of a difference rather than a problem.  The shorter tie rod on the HICAS rack will lead to more bump steer than the Starion Rack.  This is all theory of course.  I'll get measurements for A and B when its light again.  Also note how measly the 240 tie rod is.  Part of this is due to the fact that the Starion tie rod had to experience more than just tension and compression, it had to deal with the strains of that curve located above B.  I don't see this to be a problem although I'll see how well it works after a few rallycrosses and drift events :-D.  I do have the option of upgrading to Moog inner and outter tie rods.  Might be a good investment.
This is one thing I'll be having trouble with.  The bolts on the tie rod ends are different thicknesses.  The HICAS rack's bolt is larger (A<B).  I'm going to have to bore or drill the knuckle.

 

© 2003 Bowman Cybernetics